Plus the hangers around the south side ofside on the model bridge had been preset because the broken hanger separately. The degree south the model bridge had been preset because the broken hanger separately. The degree of harm was set set12.five , 25 , 37.5 andand 50 , respectively. EDC17 DC24 belongs to of damage was to to 12.five , 25 , 37.five 50 , respectively. EDC17 DC24 belongs to the second category, in which damage occurred in two hangers simultaneously. The The dethe second category, in which damage occurred in two hangers simultaneously. degree of damage was also set toset to 12.5 , 25 , 37.5 , 50 ,50 , respectively. Table five all of the gree of damage was also 12.5 , 25 , 37.five , and and respectively. Table five lists lists all damage circumstances investigated in the test model. the damage conditions investigated in the test model.Table 5. Twenty-four harm conditions considered by the test model. Table 5. Twenty-four damage conditions thought of by the test model.Damage Case No. Harm Case No. EDC 1 EDC 1 EDC five Single hanger failure Single hanger EDC 5 EDC 92 EDC 136 failure EDC 92 EDC 170 Double hanger failure EDC 136 EDC 214 Double hanger EDC 170 failure EDC 214 4.three. Harm Identification Benefits Harm Variety Harm Sort Damage Hanger No. Harm Hanger No. S2 S2 S3 S3 S4 S5 S4 S4 S5 S5 S4 S6 S4 S5 S4 S6 Damage Degree Damage Degree 12.5 25 37.five 50 12.five 25 37.five 50 12.five 25 37.5 50 12.5 25 37.5 50 12.five 25 37.five 50 12.five 25 37.5 50 12.five 25 37.five 50 12.five 25 37.5 50 12.five 25 37.five 50 12.five 25 37.5 50 12.five 25 37.5 50 12.5 25 37.five 50Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, x FOR PEER REVIEW12 of 17 The model cable force was adjusted to about 350 N, as well as the south hanger cable force four.three. Harm Identification Results is shown in Figure 11. The cable force is uniform, and this state might be regarded because the The model cable bridge. completed state with the force was adjusted to about 350 N, and the south hanger cable force is shown in Figure 11. The cable force is uniform, and this state is usually regarded as the completed state of your bridge.cable force350Cable force250 200 150 100 50SSSSSSSSSHanger numberFigure Cable force of of south hangers. Figure 11.11. Cable force south hangers.The complete damage (the cable force is reduced by one hundred ) every single hanger on on south The total damage (the cable force is reduced by one hundred ) ofof each and every hanger the the sideside was simulatedremoving the damaged hanger itself. The The difference of dewas simulated by by removing the broken hanger itself. difference of deflection south at the anchorage point of hanger and tie-beam below Nitrocefin Anti-infection wholesome state state and many flection at the anchorage point of hanger and tie-beam under healthyand SB 271046 site various damage circumstances was was obtained, along with the benefits are plotted in Figure 12. Then, the dedamage conditionsobtained, as well as the final results are plotted in Figure 12. Then, the deflection distinction influence matrix of the model bridge in this state state was also obtained. flection difference influence matrix of your model bridge in thiswas also obtained.0 lection modify anchorage point -1 -2 -S1 S2 S3 SAppl. Sci. 2021, 11,The comprehensive harm (the cable force is reduced by one hundred ) of every single hanger on the south side was simulated by removing the broken hanger itself. The difference of deflection at the anchorage point of hanger and tie-beam under healthier state and various harm circumstances was obtained, and the outcomes are plotted in Figure 12. Then, the de12 of 16 flection distinction influence.
